- This topic has 6 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated January 18, 2020 at 8:10 pm by .
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
- The topic ‘drhook’ is closed to new replies.
First Blood Gaming › Forums › Leagues › Defense of the Ancients › Ban Requests › Processed Requests › drhook
Unvouch no one wants to play with this guy people dodge lobbies he’s in so they won’t get “hoook’d” ricefire and mustard tiger were both in game live rice saw it from same team view and mustard from obs view he ran circles whole game unwilling join team he was jingling whole we mid than im final min while we getting throned he stayed in base unwilling to defend it and we lose he should be unvouched not for just game play just for the way makes whole league feel around him
Feel free to edit your post and include timestamps (with a brief description of what he did) as the format mentions, else this request will be denied.
Thanks
He wouldn’t play as a team and push I believe 27 min mark we take down t2 and procced push to t3 but creeped died we wait for them he tps top instead push with us and had wait for him walk back and at the final 2 mins as were losing throne rhasta is able to go in and defend and you clearly can see him is there full hp dosent bother go in so he dosent die protecting he’s kdr
It clearly shows he didn’t care go in and defend with team he let rhasta die solo and we lose he could go in if not blink even walk in and try to call and defend but he didn’t even try it just goes to show he’s character as a person never team plays never tries be as a team
TOday dr.hook missed 2 Queue’s in a row – queue’d 3rd time
agree with the above he is a KDR player
LUL
When you report a player, please list time and describe what the player did wrong. Our admin team are not going to waste few hours to watch replay. Please spend your time to make a list and summarize reason why we ban the players. That will help our admin team a lot to save time. We need your cooperation. Thanks
And we do not punish player just because of saying nobody want to play with him. We process brq make decision by the fact and evidence.
No response on the requested above (and after a initial review, there only 2 instances with minor impact)
Processing
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 | 29 | 30 |
Loading...