- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated December 10, 2019 at 2:56 pm by
.
-
Posts
-
Your Warcraft III username: Kuma
Violator’s Warcraft III username: Ricefire
Violated Rule(s): Refusing captains lane assignment.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):passed 2min, I asked rice don’t tp top, and stay bot to confirm lane domination. I asked rice multiple times after he left the lane, but he still tp top feeding like crazy.
Additional Information: Reason for my request was to;
1. make sure our tri lane wins
2. have enemy gain 0 exp
3. less exposure to feedRices tp caused enemy tri lane to gain more exp/gold by his deaths, inadvertently gave viper(their offlane) xp because its hard to zone with single support, and used up his tp(timer) for when mid gets ganked because he kept using it for getting to lane faster, rather than counter ganks. This is supposedly a t2 player, so I expected more, than this borderline t5 gameplay.
After reviewing this replay, I have come to the following conclusions.
1. Your main point is to have your tri-lane win. Almost instantly, your tri lane combines to kill viper. After viper elects to walk back to lane, you guys have complete control and a huge advantage over viper. It is then that wd (rice) decides to go top. His main reasoning was you didn’t need him in that lane. You and SK combine to then kill viper 3 additional times, making sure lane is won at 4-0. After this, I would argue the game opens up and lane rotations are a bit irrelevant, but it is almost impossible to argue that you did not indeed win that lane even without WD>
2. Viper was zoned pretty heavily, and died repeatedly to your stun/ray combo. He was crippled from the first death, and never really recovered until much much later in the game. I would argue that once again, this lane was won comfortably even with just two heros.
3. This is a valid point. While rice did die a few times, especially early top. They were not in my opinion feeding or ruining plays. NA (Jag) played very cautious and kind of left rice out to dry, but his rotation did allow scourge to regain control of top lane as well, making sure you were winning 2 lanes (mid and bot) and at least breaking even top.
Overall, players are obligated to play the heros captain picks, and go to their initial lane responsibilities. I find that ricefire did his job as support, rotating with wards, and did not sufficiently cost you bottom lane, as you still won it comfortably.
However, I do think both of you were antagonizing each other throughout the game, with the chatlog bearing this out. We do not currently have a length of time required for a player to remain in initial lanes… and while I understand your frustration I do think he was trying to act for the good of the team.
In regards to the ban, this request is denied.
I will however be chatting with Ricefire to remain positive with regards to in-game interactions. In the end, I do not think his actions caused game ruining or throwing in this instance. Thank you for the request, and if you have any future situations please submit and we will be happy to review.
Processing.
- The topic ‘RiceFire’ is closed to new replies.