Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Player currently in our discord – was tested, and was told to practice a bit more and apply again later
Processing
Player left server (will try to contact him to see if he’s still interested)
Processing
Contacted player on Discord to see if heโs still interested.
Processing
Contacted player on Discord to see if he’s still interested.
Processing
Ban appeal approved
Processing
June 4, 2021 at 7:37 pm in reply to: unban EternalFame + poor moderator handling on first appeal and on ban handling #10807Ban expires in 9 hours, no response
Processing
June 3, 2021 at 3:14 pm in reply to: unban EternalFame + poor moderator handling on first appeal and on ban handling #10804So after reviewing both games, i got a couple questions for you, EternalFame:
1st game (blinden brq – https://firstbloodgaming.com/forums/topic/eternalflame-trolling-tk-2/?view=all
your roll Tuskar/ghoul/tribes/overseer/grizz/neotank
your team – lod/ogre/dm + aqua/turret/dm/necro + cw/dm/dp/ship1) Why are you playing this roll on free? Not unplayable, but given you are on a free rr, it makes 0 sense why you’re playing this
2) 7/2 for 7 with 4 ghouls, 2 overseers – claiming you wanted to take free hold here (when the 3 other lanes are stronger than you, rollwise and definitely better holders 10), and you have immo as well – Want to explain?2nd game (okbik brq – https://firstbloodgaming.com/forums/topic/eternalflame-trolling-tk/?view=all )
1) You could read chat and read them discussing BO + add send (and even a message which said “only add if spirit minimum”) – you end up sending the frostwolf + bow, which doens’t align with your team send at all – care to explain?
2) On 5, your kc asks for HP, you’re upping reg first – on 6, you keep upping reg (with a good amount already), when its clear u need attack for 6 and 7 (since u only had 1 holder) – Why?
3) You have cannons/grizz/dp, and you decide to get 2 UNDEAD privateers on 12 – care to explain?Looking forward for your answers, thanks in advance
Ban expired (Also decided to check the replay – clog call was made early, it was 1-1 vote, and the rest of the team upped king agreeing to the call, except you who said, and i quote “i will historically veto clog, and we all sit with no income”, so nothing to discuss here)
Processing
Approved for trial (check your discord DM’s)
Processing
After reviewing:
Dodo does miss the warrior send – went afk for a second, ends up missing the send, and apologizes for it
And considering she has a clean history so far, gonna warn only for this single instance
Processing
Approved for trial (reviews done with Moa)
Welcome ๐
Approved for trial – Check your discord messages
Processing
Approved for trial (reviews done with n1ll3)
After reviewing:
Debugged on single mode (with -spawnall active), and ns does indeed hold solo lvl 2 as long as it doens’t walk off the wall (did 15 tests, only in 2 it failed to hold and in both times it walked off wall), so without this happening, JP would have 200g by lvl3 (43g + 147g + 10 from the BO send), would have held 3 as well (and change the lane outcome)
He did build for 3 (despite leaking once again).
As for the send lvl3: he sent it at the same time as Inti (u can see both furbs missed the send timing by half second. at the send area), so it wasn’t a late/missed send – they sent when they had the lumber for it.
tl;dr – He could have played it more safe, and get a t1 for lvl2, but definitely not tk, or game ruining
Processing
Approved, congratulations!
Processing
-
AuthorPosts
