bad – forcing send

[okbik]

Your Warcraft III username: okbik
Violator’s Warcraft III username: bad
Violated Rule(s): forcing send
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): lvl 7 – minute 12
Additional Information: We scout immo, we have tm and only 1 mediocre holder, bad forces send into scouted immo and we almost lose 4 heals 7
https://wc3stats.com/games/155730/chat

• This topic was modified 2 years, 8 months ago by Humanoid-Freak.
• This topic was modified 2 years, 8 months ago by Humanoid-Freak.

Attachments:

1. LastReplay-2.w3g

[EricS]

Nobody dislikes okbik more than me, so when we agree on something you know it’s BAD.

Regards
EricS

[mslove]

i dont see any “force send”

dont waste admins time..

[EricS]

Me and Okbik (Who was captain) said SEVERAL TIMES not to send on 7, at most like 2 mits/2 herms. Yet bad was sending all his lumber.

That would give us the same outcome of -1 on their side, but would keep us from losing 4 heals.

Speaking of wasting time… Why are you checking replays and commenting if you have no say in the matter anyhow?

Regards
EricS

[Humanoid-Freak]

Hello Okbik and Bad,

i always said that sending 1 furb solo is not bannable for solo send for me.
Here its kinda the same, you were all discussing several scenarios when to send, if to send, k10 or skip but you didnt reach any decision yet.

Bad send one furb and than it become kinda of a own dynamic, erics sending furb as well, okbik agreed to add hermit, and purple also added.

Its a tough decision but its true that bad solo send and later on added 2 furbs and 2 hermits on 7. While EricS and okbik wanted to fullskip.

I just handle out short ban 6 hours, bad you also have no single ban in your history for any rulebreak.

Processed.

• This reply was modified 2 years, 8 months ago by Humanoid-Freak.

[Author]

Posts