- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated February 5, 2023 at 2:54 pm by
.
-
Posts
-
Your Warcraft III username:sweatheart
Violator’s Warcraft III username:lordmilles
Violated Rule(s):do not force sends
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):end of lvl 1
Additional Information:we disagreed on lvl 2 send because we were bad 3, but he forced it regardlessThey leaked lvl 2 to king , so send was fine , someone mention 2 or king i think it was pink , so i said lets 2 because enemy send lvl 1 wars so we had time , i reach bo and the others , but pink went from 1/0 to 3/1 at this time so he end up sending just hermit , if he didnt went from 1/0 to 3/1 and send properly we take a heal or force them to king , because the leak would be bigger.
Not to mention that pink was our holder , no idea why he went from 1/0 to 3/1 on lvl 1 and leak lvl 3 to a shit send
Doesnt matter the outcome when team doesnt agree. This is a straight up force send, that killed us on lvl 3.
killed us on 3 ? What do you mean by killed ? We used 1 heal which is fine , and it was pink mistake cause he pushed while he is holder lol 😀
PLEASE DEFINE “KILLED” on lvl 3 , since as far i remember this game ENDED on lvl 17 and the only one MID from our team against enemy send was ME , but yeah killed us on 3 Bullshits
Well I understand this involved a bit of miscommunication – BUT pink did suggest 2 but as soon as Sweatheart said no he said he expressed that he did not care hence it was a discussion between you LordMiles and Sweatheart, you should have involved yellow before forcing the send (and yellow didn’t like it either “Why you force)
Banned 24h for solosending.
- The topic ‘lordmilles force send’ is closed to new replies.