- This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated April 24, 2023 at 4:36 pm by
.
-
Posts
-
Your Warcraft III username: eld3r
Violator’s Warcraft III username: Reid
Violated Rule(s): RQ
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Lvl 19
Additional Information:
Team West asked 2 times for a draw after both Teams didnt die on lvl 17.
According to the Picture they really didnt wanna play this game.
Reid decided to leave after we made clear that we not want to draw the game.
After he left the game, like 10 seconds later, he immediately writes “lights out warn me”.
Who the fuck is immediately on discord, asking for a warn, when his lights are out?
He screwed us big times, and was not serious at all and it couldnt be more obvious as he did.
It was such a disrespectful leave and he didnt care that we wanted to keep playing.
He also just disappeared after that RQ.
As well you can see their chat, and Reid is nobody who “dc” ever. It was just a clear leave and evrybody knows it.
And i hope mods dont get baited by this troll.-
This topic was modified 1 year ago by
.
-
This topic was modified 1 year ago by .
-
This topic was modified 1 year ago by
.
Attachments:
If HE REALLY had a dc or whatever, he would fken fight to gain our trust, we all know him, but he didnt even bothered. He just disappeared. He didnt give a F**K.
Man theres dc after lvl 1 70 king leak that more suspicious than that lol you just making a case cause you mad. Game was not lost at all and to be honest i would be ashamed to do this brq since we had no 7-10 hold and tm and you couldnt even kill us pre 20.
I am mad about a ragequit, thats correct.
I know u are happy about his RQ, because he left in YOUR Favour!
Talking about Shame is, that u comment here and try to hide a Ragequiter.
(who cares what spell u had? Does your spell allow some1 to leave a game or why u come with this unrelevant argumentation??) That is indeed a Shame u come with!Hello!
I can understand that it must be very frustrating when somebody leaves at a suspicious timing. It has happened to all of us atleast once. For this case i must say there isn’t enough proof to hand him a 96 hour ban. The dc warning will stand. If you see any other suspicious behaviour, feel free to post another banrequest.Denied.
-
This topic was modified 1 year ago by
- The topic ‘Reid RQ’ is closed to new replies.