Forums

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sweat #22975
    sweatheart
    Participant

      Since i had no holder game i decided to add one ob one, was kinda messy especially on 10. I find it a good showcase of reading a roll, even if i did small mistake on 5(didnt send a bow + sell lm)

      Attachments:
      in reply to: Retrial RQ for pudgey #22931
      sweatheart
      Participant

        The fact that you start your last reply with comments such as:”nonsense reply” and “leave it to adults” proves my point even further. Your personality and approach towards situations make our time in FBG a lot less enjoyable, or at some points unbearable.
        You are not getting attacked. There is nothing bad about being wrong. When u become adult you will realise that being wrong can be good for you. If you feel you are being attacked write a brq. He wanted to say that u dont know enough to make calls.

        in reply to: Retrial RQ for pudgey #22928
        sweatheart
        Participant

          As Danny said this is a competetive team game where skill is important for the overall health of the community. This BRQ is meant for retrial not banning you or unvouching you. I have nothing personal against you. Your actions comments both in game, post game or your provocations are making fbg a worse place, harder to enjoy an equal game, which with u happens rather infrequently.

          In conclusion u have poor behavior and poor game knowledge/skill. Because of that retrial is necessary.

          in reply to: Retrial RQ for pudgey #22922
          sweatheart
          Participant

            You being allowed to behave like this in public makes a terrible example to the community. Regardless of who you are provoking this is not acceptable. If we add that your LTD skills are below average, an action towards you must be taken. Thats why I believe retrial must be more commonly utilised and you can be one of those. No matter for how long you have been sticking around you are dodge worthy.

            in reply to: Retrial RQ for pudgey #22894
            sweatheart
            Participant

              Here is where i decided to stop. The chat before that was “resolved” even though his poison was lingering around and continues to do so!

              in reply to: Retrial RQ for pudgey #22893
              sweatheart
              Participant

                part 3

                in reply to: Retrial RQ for pudgey #22886
                sweatheart
                Participant

                  pt2 of images

                  in reply to: Sweat #20405
                  sweatheart
                  Participant

                    gates mix

                    Attachments:
                    in reply to: Sweat #20388
                    sweatheart
                    Participant

                      Im dropping another decent game.

                      Attachments:
                      in reply to: klamtsvin#2740 with another tk #20310
                      sweatheart
                      Participant

                        There is no relevence between this ban request and the comment, nor my decisions on posting ban requests. If the moderation think i should be removed, i will take it. However this will not solve the ban request regarding teamkill. This is the 3rd request for teamkill where klam is involved. Past were were processed and applied. Klam is known for TK!

                        in reply to: klaa insults #20304
                        sweatheart
                        Participant

                          I would like to add the discord log since he still uses malicious language. This is unacceptable, especially when it negatively affects the mood in the chat.

                          Attachments:
                          in reply to: BlindeN#21622 – intentional teamkilling / harassment #20269
                          sweatheart
                          Participant

                            To me thats a tk not using thorns on 7. Was close call but its survivable. Him flaming was not necessary especially when he could up himself. Leak on 2 was too big to be saved with 2 atks and few regens, needed a lot more.

                            in reply to: Ban Javiercar #20077
                            sweatheart
                            Participant

                              This javiarcar guy have tked me so many times that i started avoiding him. I dont understand is he that bad or just he intentionally soft tk players. I support this brq.

                              sweatheart
                              Participant

                                After the disconned I asked the team what u they want to do. The requested draw. So did i.

                                in reply to: lordmilles force send #19986
                                sweatheart
                                Participant

                                  Doesnt matter the outcome when team doesnt agree. This is a straight up force send, that killed us on lvl 3.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)
                                Donate
                                Clan FBG Events
                                May 2024
                                M T W T F S S
                                 12345
                                6789101112
                                13141516171819
                                20212223242526
                                2728293031