[gonzuipanties]

denied – left server

[gonzuipanties]

Denied – left server

[gonzuipanties]

Sorry for the late late review but better than never.

replay1
free roll: parrot geo rifle priest kodo panth
*dropped kodo geo parrot and rr (very good)

new roll: murloc terrain captain necro moonguard
*you start 1/0 with mg+parrot
– big oof…this is the easiest defiler terrain start of my life and you’d have flexible options to either setup mg5 into warden7 or push depending on game state
– but since purple is trolling and they sent 2 so it’s less of an issue now
*enemy resend 4 and u mid with 505 val
– it should be freelo at this point u get free push and do upped terrain 5
*enemy eat ur 5 send and both goes 2-2 heals on 7
*you ff 10 with no mids
– slight build issue on 10 otherwise you’d mid. you should be doing farm and spam 8 murlocs(3 blockers, 5 with lineup). this captain doesn’t help much

Rating 7/10
Starting mg over defiler is criminal – you should be able to start premium yolos into carry as needed
Good awareness to plan stay 1/0 on 2 due to vet speed
Game went your way 2-4 and adapted push
Slight build issue on 10
Overall you did as correct as you could with mg start, besides level 10

replay2
free roll: tuskar, ea, sentry, ywd, zombie, flamebeard
*you decide to start flamebeard – yikes man
Now idc how the game goes but there are so many issues with this start
1 super selfish play. your team is ea para, snake, defiler. be a teamplayer and start ea for slow game
2 you have terrible adds for fb all levels. the reason to play flamebeard is if you have good t1 adds that allow for sexy early push into clear or mid 7. you are just playing flamebeard just because you wanted to
3. If you somehow shine this game, it’s due to luck
– level 1 normally you’d leak more vs warr and be stuck 2/0 or free leak 2 with 3/0
– Upping EA on 5 when u can up NS…which SHOULD make u leak 6 but luck was on ur side(double ko clear)

Rating 3/10
Overall selfish play, lucky early game.

Conclusion:
I think you’re trying to prove yourself, especially with the flamebeard replay. Both games your team would love a yolo lane to make a slow game. Game1(if purple play with half a brain) you just cripple ur team starting mg. Game2 same thing starting flamebeard. I like how you adapt your builds after lv1 onward but ur starting builds are the big concern. In Fbg, can really do whatever and it works but in LIHL will be gamebreaking.

Deny for now. I think you have the skill to build and adapt, with minor assistance but starting these low push starter units when have PREMIUM YOLOS in roll is the dealbreaker(especially when your team setup begs for a chaos game).
Note: LIHL trial is not for you to prove yourself and re-invent the wheel, but rather to show you can adapt LIHL meta, and currently you’re not there yet.
I would suggest if you plan to re-apply, try to play your roll as optimally as possible

[gonzuipanties]

Trial approved 9/1/25

[gonzuipanties]

Accepted 10/23

[gonzuipanties]

Trial denied 11/3

[gonzuipanties]

Accepted for trial 10/24

[gonzuipanties]

Game1 – Aqua yolo
free roll – snake, novice, harpy, priest, wyv, panther

-You dropped 2novice+1snake and rr on 1
-I already rate this game 1/10 for rr this insane free roll.
*It shows you lack unit knowledge. This is a very versatile roll that can yolo hard and/or mid all levels

Game2 – disc yolo
Free roll – bone, spider, crab, medicine man, disc, dp

• Disc start, your team eats enemy warrior send and you scout landmine
• Good decision to 3/1 and solo disc 2
• Your team goal 4 and 5 while enemy skip. Game is unlosable at this point
• Your team skip 7 and goal 8. Both teams now have 1 heal with SW
• 7/5 7 is correct, 7/6 8 is correct
• The call after 8 is full 10
  *Even though you have 2 lanes staying 7/3 and 2 lanes 7/6 atm, with both teams 1 heal SW. I would stay 7/6 here instead of pushing 7/7 and build rest for dmg 10 in the off chance that you might lose a race 10, highly unlikely but possible(since Purple didn’t mid 10)

I rate this game 8/10. Game was very easy from the start and you were free to full push all game

Game3
free roll – gnoll, lubber, gg, pris, alchemist, sg
– you dropped 5 lubs and rr
*Normally this would be ok but your team has max yolo rolls with small opportunity to damage 10 with 7/4 but can never mid, so I would at least keep this roll until level 3 to drop at least 2 gnolls for 10 insurance. Or do 4 lubs 4 gnolls and rr

New roll – para, ea, cannon, overseer, nm, dk

• you keep 5 lubs and send warr
  *I dont like this. You can make the case for playing lubs over ea/cannon. But with para in roll you must start either ea or cannon.
  *Especially when you send warr, you are dead if they come 2 and mega weak on 4
  *Since you have DK and likely plan to DK 5 if given the opportunity, the optimal play here would be starting cannon, into +para and small archer on 2. This clears your lane 2 and you are fine 3 4 if they skip with sub 500val and can bank for dk5.
• you scout EA mid with 2 lanes 50-60%. Big chance enemy team send 2
• enemy team sent 2 and your team get goaled with you leaking 7 creeps+BO
• you do small cannon 3 into big cannon 4 575val with no bank for dk5. Your lane is now super awkward nolo with no option for 2 dk7
• you get nice goal 4 and do 2nd cannon 835val 3/1
• good decision to commit 3/1 and up a priv on 6 since good chance enemy send 6 after burning heal 4 and skipping 5
• Lucky for you enemy send 6, you go mid and basically auto mid 7 to a resend.
• You mid 10 and stay /4, enemy team sent 15 while you skip and die. You end with 3835val 7/4 and 66 inc

I rate this game 4/10. The building decisions you made from lv1 haunted you this game. You could achieve the same result with higher push/inc if you just start cannon into para + small archer 2, min hold 3 4 with 2nd small archer and ez dk5 with at least 5/2.

Since these replays are a month old, I will review 2 recent random replays
FBG LTD84
free roll – ent, lub, watcher, pris, Komodo, ygg

• you start 5 lub and send warr
  *I would always start watcher over lub, unless you have good adds to carry, which you dont. Watcher if given same value as lubber build would do better 2,4,5(even full clear or mid 3)
  *Same situation with game 3, you start lub when call is warr. If you do watcher here you can do 3/0 5watcher on 2 and mid vs send
• enemy leak 33 3 lanes and LOD eat all
• enemy send 4 and you rip as 470 lubber
• Game is 90% over at this point so I stopped watching

I rate this game 3/10

FBG LTD82
free roll – snake, dwarf figher, turret, mudman, disc, GOD (supreme yolo with OP clear potential if needed)

• you start disc and both team send 2
  • you go 220 disc on 2 and 4/0. This is fine but with turret+snake add you dont need 2nd disc ever.
    *I’d just 260 here with 3snakes 4/0 into turret 3 ez hold 350 while not rip to 2 send(you were mega lucky to only leak 2 creeps 2)
• you do standard 2 disc build into dropping a few snake+turret and rr into polar and no adds – sold turret, snakes and do polar 5
  *since you dont utilize snakes, your lane is just a full suicide push lane now
• you think enemy team send 6 and add a 2nd polar
  *This is not good. at 680 value with 2 disc 2 polar you do nothing vs a 6 send, and if they dont send, you dont feed your carry lane 6 and potentially steal feed from other leakers with absolute garbage roll
• enemy team sent 6 and u are stuck 7/3 when you could have been 7/4 on 5. I stopped watching here

I rate this game 4/10

Note: We dont judge calls for LIHL application. What matters are your builds and situational awareness
Conclusion: You like to stick to standard builds which is fine since people tend to overcook and end up with suboptimal builds. You do have some situational awareness but overall your unit knowledge and builds are quite weak. Snake is insanely strong unit and good adds to any builds, yolo or ob, yet you aren’t using it in the 2 games i reviewed. I’d like to see you expand your build mixes some more to see what works and what doesn’t, and observe LIHL games to see builds if you don’t wanna risk your FBG elo lol. Deny for now

• This reply was modified 6 months, 1 week ago by gonzuipanties.

Attachments:

1. FBG-LTD82.w3g
2. FBG-LTD84.w3g

[gonzuipanties]

The entitlement is strong in this one

[gonzuipanties]

I support this ape request

[gonzuipanties]

I dont think you have temperament issue at all and can adapt to the role.
!support

[gonzuipanties]

Still the same behavior as his last vouch request. We need someone who has empathy and a neutral mindset for admin, not a child with god complex.

[gonzuipanties]

epicdeath wrote:

From my experience I’m against an unvouch here. I really don’t see elder being the aggressor, rather responding poorly to provocation or failing to de-escalate an arguement and it continuing out of proportion. In my eyes neither of those situations warrant removal since I wouldnt consider them to be a result of toxicity rather than volatility. And, from the one’s I’ve been party to, I would not consider elder to be the only one at fault.

Agree Elder is not the only one at fault.

There are plenty of people that need to pull their heads out of their own asses and own up their own build mistakes(Example: free leaks that are game breaking, or trash OB that fails to hold). If Elder is on the team, he would get heated, cant blame the guy. But I’ve seen many times where the players who make these mistakes will not admit fault and further escalate the tension then Elder is seen to be the only bad guy here which is not true.

I’ve seen Elder admit to sub-optimal play before, unlike some others who always put blame on other factors to justify their decisions.

[gonzuipanties]

!support oblith. Perhaps he will yolo more as admin

[gonzuipanties]

root wrote:

inability to be unbiased.

+
No support

[Author]

Posts