Forums

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LIHL Admin Application #13535
    ThanoS
    Participant

      absolute no brainer – !support

      in reply to: Vouch Request #9968
      ThanoS
      Participant

        !no support
        Can already see he’s a cry baby – don’t let other people cry their way into Lihl.
        People do this for free, stop wasting their time.
        This is a troll thread.
        And @grant, please check your facts. It’s far easier to get into Lihl atm than it ever has been.

        • This reply was modified 4 years ago by ThanoS.
        • This reply was modified 4 years ago by ThanoS.
        in reply to: LIHL Admin #9745
        ThanoS
        Participant

          !big support
          Please make Lihl harder to get into, see far too many average players get vouched. Think Tin being a veteran/active would be a great addition for the mod team.
          I know it’s not normal for support and no support on a staff app. However just think we need to be tougher on what standard of play gets vouched.

          in reply to: Quail again for LIHL-trial vouch #7101
          ThanoS
          Participant

            @7years,
            You think leaking 1 to no send is good play?
            Ofcourse under building 1 ie. 2 turrets ect then leak is fine – it’s RnG
            But not a 100% leak to no send. This isn’t good.
            And if you think holding furb 2 with 3 turrets and splitter add, staying 2/0, to then 5 turret and splitter for 3 is good(v no send remember), then that’s your opinion. 4 turret, one splitter can hold, along with if you wanna play safe, go 2 splitter. With correct build ofcourse. This 5th turret cost him 2 wisps by start of 3. No need to discuss and add your opinion against mine, this is not a place to argue someone’s opinion, it’s about the trialist which my point is focused on.

            in reply to: Quail again for LIHL-trial vouch #7077
            ThanoS
            Participant

              I’ll explain my reasoning.
              I don’t judge new trails early on, they need time to adapt and see how the meta and most efficient builds are played here. I needed time to adapt too and still learning myself.
              I tend to judge trialist when they’re comfortable and played a good amount of games – which you have.

              By this time you should have your own lane sorted, with just some minor adjustments however these mistakes were the opposite.

              So my judgement is you played 2 really bad plays, which should be an elementary level tier play to execute. Hence why, nosupport

              • This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by ThanoS.
              in reply to: Quail again for LIHL-trial vouch #7073
              ThanoS
              Participant

                Nice guy but far too many mistakes last few days.
                – solo wyv 1 (leaks no send, enemy warr on 1 anyway so didn’t matter so much, but bad knowledge)
                – big ob with turrets for no reason (furb on 2, 3 turrets + small add) 5 turrets for 3 vs no send.. 500+ value, still 2/0 after going mid 2 vs the furb.
                Feel the above should be mandatory/standard/easy play, sorry !nosupport

                • This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by ThanoS.
                • This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by ThanoS.
                in reply to: Vouch DarkKnight #6109
                ThanoS
                Participant

                  !nosupport,
                  Believe he should be given a chance later when the obvious attitude/behaviour issues haven’t been there for a month or two

                  in reply to: Vouch Request – Noobmagnet #4956
                  ThanoS
                  Participant

                    !support, good player with knowledge. Good enough for trial

                    in reply to: Vouch Request – Stucci #4852
                    ThanoS
                    Participant

                      Still has a lot to learn, but improved vastly since his trial. Would go towards extended trial period or !support

                      in reply to: Vouch Request LForward #4851
                      ThanoS
                      Participant

                        Great member for the LTD community
                        !support

                        in reply to: Voucher Request – Zapp #4850
                        ThanoS
                        Participant

                          Seen some great games, and seen some really interesting/tk decisions.
                          Kind of on the fence, but again agree with above that an extended trial period would be good.

                          in reply to: Vouch Request QuietNutter #4849
                          ThanoS
                          Participant

                            Think it’s close, but overall agree with above and think not ready.
                            Although, maybe an extended trial period to give some more time to see improvements could be worthwhile.

                            in reply to: Vouch Req. ThanoS #3672
                            ThanoS
                            Participant

                              @lihladmin @hyo

                              Attachments:
                            Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
                            Donate
                            Clan FBG Events
                            April 2025
                            M T W T F S S
                             123456
                            78910111213
                            14151617181920
                            21222324252627
                            282930