[H4ken]

Fly’s warn/ban history is full of dcs and bans for those dcs. When at the same time we encourage ppl to take more action securing stable inet connection that possibly states it’s not a ragequit. You even took the win at the end. I cannot have more evidence rather than his repetitive dcing in many games that i would suppose some of them were even winning for his team.
If you have problems with your inet connection, fly, contant kappa and let him know so he might be able to help you with that problem.

If you still consists on the ragequit, Shambles, you can post more replays and another admin take care of it.

Also for this time im gonna do your brqs shambles…but next time any of them that don’t follow the format would be declined before investigation

[H4ken]

Confirming him going afk after 13 holding 1.2k value. 3rd offence within 4 months. Even count as an fbg member you break the tolerance.

Banned for 168h (1 week)

[H4ken]

Okay im gonna be really harsh on that one. First of all this is one of the most bs brq i have ever read in my life. He was minor afk of 10 seconds on 3 just cause he was looking the ea guide. He followed all of your calls step by step. You don’t excpect a trial to know how to split especially with ea. 80% of the vouched fbg community does not even know how to do it correctly.He leaked all levels as he was supposed to. You told him to split incorectly even. He did try his best to understand what you wanted and he even asked sorry for it and followed your plan exactly. Why are you even posting this brq?

[H4ken]

Well, Elf pushed 7/4 till end of 11 and it wouldn’t make any difference to push even more than 7/3 even. I agree that him staying 7/2 10 was completely unecessary and a “tk” move but i don’t think that part was any intentional. Try to be more cooperative to your team needs elf in the future.

Denied

[H4ken]

There is nothing really bad on the dt on 6 rather than kobold.
Lvl 2 was really a solo send tho. Given it didn’t affect the game so much and it’s first violation on that matter, dpteacher you are banned for

4h

[H4ken]

Given you have a past on ragequiting(2nd time) and it seems obvious in this situation aswell. (Consulted more than 1 admin for this) this is a ban.

Banned for 168h (1 week). You can ban appeal if you provide solid evidence of it being a disconnect rather than a ragequit, qwef.

As for the rest.
Less micromanagment EF.
Bencho, that wasn’t a good behavior from your part
09:35 Allies bencho96 how did u get in fbg
14:35 Allies bencho96 huge noob
It surely felt that the combination of your behaviors was def played a role in this ragequit.
Chillax.

[H4ken]

Lvl1 felt like an honest mistake. As for lvl 5, i don’t think his intention was to leak nor i believe that him doing that was made for you to get kobolded. I fail to see any intentional tk, just not good/experienced way of playing mili/egg.

Denied.

Next time when you are in a roll you don’t feel comfortable playing, dickless, consult with your teamates to maximize your lane’s potencial.

[H4ken]

I fail to see anything bannable here. Not only from rules perspective but for gameplay aswell. His 7/5 wouldn’t change anything nor i see a point in game in which he build in order to grief his teamates.
Denied

[H4ken]

Communication pre the point of solo sending was not so clear although sending just cause you need gold (you can easily avoid by not pushing 4/0 with ea) def puts your team in not such a good spot. Taken it’s your first time and you not the only one who have fallen for the ea trap im gonna give you minimum.

Banned for 4h.

[H4ken]

!Support

[H4ken]

There is no flame to take into consideration. If you do a mistake it’s only natural to hear couple of negative comments. Take them as feedback and improve. If you don’t like playing with someone you can always avoid them. Both of you.

Processed

[H4ken]

It really get’s super annoying at this rate. I don’t find any excessive flaming nor i think okbik’s and your teams reaction was over the line for they were actually correct. Regardless staying 7/5 is not intentional tk nor there is any excessive flame. Move on.

Processed

[H4ken]

I fail to see how you advised him rather than micromanaged him. He announced he had a plan of going privs.
You interupted with it and told him exactly what to do okbik. +some minor toxicity.

Maybe if you let him execute his plan things would be better.
Push was needed in your team regardless. It was executed poorly but that’s cause you didn’t allow qwef to act on his own.

No ban will be given.

Processed

[H4ken]

I don’t find anything in second game regarding “forcing send”. Ranz was pretty communicated till that point and pretty much everyone jumps on furbmit call without thinking it. First game it really seemed like it was somehow forced but since 2 people silent and 2 opposing each other it’s not a total force send.

There is nothing ban worthy. Ill contact ranzkopp and suggest him to spend a little bit more time discussing his calls and intentions.

Processed

[H4ken]

Hello Wezygoopie. I think given you are lihl is pretty easy to know you do the leaking hence your full build doesn’t seem so justified, although i can take your word that it was a mistake and can happen to anyone.
Your anger really popped of after the negative comments which is understandable(?) since it wasn’t even excesive flame from your part. Although as a lihl, personally attacting someone regarding his vouch on lihl is a huge no no.

Since you lihl you break the 0 tolerance rule against violations (https://discord.com/channels/437439646381637644/733979712623476776/822784709632851988)
but ill let this slide for this time cause it’s your first time and ill give you the semi minimum of ban duration for first offence.

Banned 12 hours.

[Author]

Posts