Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
1)Nobody flamed you that game
2)He left cause most of the people agreed to a remake
3)Ghost??Maybe you posted a wrong replay here Mister EternalFame.
Ill leave it open incase there is a correct game existing for those violations.
Hello gentlemen! Nikz announced his plan already on lvl 1(to rr on lvl 2). Personally i think monk can be a decent 7 holder but i fail to see anything that indicates he was trolling the game.
He cooperated and played rest of his rr just fine.
FYI, knowing nikz, if he believes monk is bad to ob with, he would rr this in a lihl game aswell to get the “looking down on fbg” part.
Moving on…
Hello gentlemen!
Now, while i see the suboptimal play from cryptonox part i aswell see the intention. 7/7 for pre 10 was a fine idea since 3 of you staying for 10. 7/9 was a strech but i don’t see problems to his intentions as your team is strong on lvl 15 and that was probably his idea for the game(leak and send 15 since 1 heal).
Although as a lihl player he could have known better and be more flexible in leaking or holding some waves since enemy team is strong 15 aswell i don’t think that violates and passes through intentional team killing for fbg standards at least as i see his intentions being correct.
Since he decided to full push and leak i don’t find any reason for him to take his roll although it was free and could make him minimize the leaks for more time possibly.
Cryptonox has no history on tking and that reason it’s even harder to think of him ruining the game without having at least some fair intentions.
Denied
Howie never meant to end his trial if not being inactive. So as long as he is gonna play he for sure deserves it!
!SupportEven tho flaming cannot be considered excessive here i still feel your way of speaking down to carlos AND benson the whole game feels like the same shambles. You even prove this point over and over again replying to this post. You even being racist but im gonna ignore this as i feel you have no idea wtf you talking about. Given your history on bans for flaming this is treated like a repeated offence.
Please calm down. Except this brq we have received a lot of complains in your behavior from other people aswell.
Banned for 48h
Brq was requested to not taken into consideration.
It’s handled in Simon’s covered brq previously
Processed
I can agree that this might not be the best kc on his part but i don’t find anything intentional in this whole scenario. Someone good on kc would have waved on bottom or try dmg some herms before waving but him killing all herms first doesn’t feel like a way to tk. He clicked properly without juggling and he did his best till end so i really doubt it was intentional.
Imo it’s a risk to dmg some herms before waving if you unsure about killing em or not but it’s outside of a point. I don’t think it’s intentional tk
Processed same way on simons reply.
Bobby went afk in the end of lvl 6 and he didn’t come back. First offence and given the remake makes it for the minimum.
Banned for 24h
Not really sure what i am suppose to do in this one as im not really sure how far your constant bantering goes. I think you have said enough things all of this time playing together with Tin and no one can be sure about how far bantering can go between you. In your own screenshot you compare tin to shambles. Not gonna judge the comparasing itself as i could but maybe that didn’t sound as a bantering to tin. Idk what else to say. As a lihl member shouldn’t been threatening you regarding your lihl application so as you should treat someone from lihl with respect as well. Ill keep this thread open so you can reply to me if there anything more you would like to add on this one…but as far as it goes i cannot know when bantering is happening and i cannot assume your side is bantering and his is not and vise versa. Especially from a screenshot taken out of an entire context.
