Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sent you a message on discord.
With no past history of flaming I’ll give a warning for this chat, not that excessive but unnecessary and unprovoked (within this game, but even with past history it doesn’t excuse childish chat like this). If you got a problem with someone just don’t sign with them or leave them alone.
What I said in the original ban request was ‘juggle on 10 was bad enough that it may have been intentional given earlier in the game he wanted to sell but no concrete evidence of that.’ I did not say that your king control was intentional griefing, I said it was a possibility given that you seemed like you didn’t want to play out the game (indicated by asking to sell after level 2 and other frustrations during the game). I don’t personally believe that you did hence I said there is no concrete evidence of that. The ban is not related to the king control whatsoever.
On 3 Armageddon asked up or burn and everyone started upping, perhaps not a explicit call but when your team ups and you don’t it’s pretty clear that you should. The alternative if you are trying to save lumber unneeded as I talked to you about on discord is to say ‘lets do x ups each’ instead of having 1 player bank wood and risk losing the heal. The lack of communication is the problem there.
On 6 soul-r says lets up king for now, same thing as for 3 happens.
From our talk on discord I got the impression that you understood why it was solo play and that you’d talk it through in future e.g asking for number of ups next time, and saying something before sending on 7. And I wouldn’t have minded reducing the time if you asked since the whole point of bans like this is to get the player to cooperate better in future. Another admin will take a look at it now since you made an appeal though.
-
This reply was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by
Quetra.
Not following team calls, sending without discussion, juggle on 10 was bad enough that it may have been intentional given earlier in the game he wanted to sell but no concrete evidence of that.
Banned 48 hours
He sent a horse on 2 without saying anything (other horse was obv for income as said in chat) then calls for send.
It didn’t affect the game that much but he did something similar here: https://firstbloodgaming.com/forums/topic/dpteacher/
So banned 48 hours for forcing send
Bullying players for having a bad game is what makes people not want to play at FBG. We all fuck up sometimes no need to torture him for 20 minutes about pushing 1 too much and dying to send. Terrible attitude from both.
Banned 48 hours both
It certainly could be PP given the circumstances of the game, but I don’t feel confident banning someone for that unless there were multiple suspicious occurrences given that its impossible to prove 100%. So no ban but report if you see it again.
Was always clear that they both wanted 18, so you shouldn’t send 17. Especially when you have an afk player whos not voting, if you’d tried to figure out what he wanted you probably would have realised sooner. You just wanted to get your way.
Anyway, If admin honestly thinks they live to another 2x Demon Firelord, 2x Kraken let me know.
It’s irrelevant what the better call is, it only matters what the team decision is.
48 hour ban for the forced send, 120 hour ban for the afk.
I would ask you the question: do you think he is playing sub optimally on purpose? To me that answer is no. Teamkill is about sabotaging your team on purpose, not playing a suboptimal build that you believe is the best option for your roll. I don’t want to be banning a player every time they have a bad game. If it happens consistently enough that you believe they may be below the vouch level then that’s a matter to discuss with admins and isn’t about punishing them via bans for being low skilled.
You dced twice in 3 days so you got banned for 24 hrs according to the rules, you were upset and said some things in chat, got muted for it. No wrongdoing. The only thing he said was ‘calm down a bit’, which is some pretty good advice.
Don’t post these again in BRQs it’s not the place contact another admin if you want to complain about admin abuse. (Which this is not so please don’t!)
You are allowed to mute players so long as it doesn’t interfere with cooperation with calls etc. In this case it did since you missed the income send on 13. Since I believe it was a mistake I will give just a warning this time but if you miss a call because of a mute in the future it will be a ban, you need to take extra care to pay attention.
Obvious that you want to run other peoples lanes from the start of the game, then you freak out when someone puts an egg to the side instead of in front and already talking about reporting him just for that. What a small thing to get upset about. Your behaviour is poor throughout the game.
‘We all know’ its not intentional TK and this is a revenge report so denied.
I do agree that Reid was trying to micromanage your build here and I don’t believe that u played sub optimally on purpose. Since it is just one person giving build advice you don’t have to take it if you disagree.
King control was ok besides missing the Kobold which has nothing to do with his high ping.
Unbanned
With what you said in the replay you were unhappy with your teammate’s choice to overbuild, so it seems clear to me that you chose to overbuild as a result, knowing it was suboptimal and a bad choice for the match. That is TKing your team on purpose because you were upset.
12 hours is a short ban all things considered so you should just wait this one out, and try and remain more calm in future.
Also considering https://firstbloodgaming.com/forums/topic/diabolico-2/ here
Both replays contain forced king ups before discussion can be had within the team with the team against the call, attitude is awful and confrontational.
Banned 72 hrs for both
-
This reply was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts