Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Was farm blocked on 14 and couldn’t build, so was just a stupid mistake rather than intentional afk. Since you have history of afk/similar mistakes will give a warning for this so we can keep track of it.
Had H4ken take a look at this too since myself and Alan looked at your last ban.
This game has been reviewed now by myself and Alan since we got access to the map.
The occasional send misclick or forgetting to build is acceptable. But not only do you have a history of complaints about you not paying attention to the game, you misclicked send twice in one game, held gold and lumber on a race level, and did not even apologise for that (saying no need to build 6). At this point it is similar to intentional TK by not paying attention to the game. It’s a competitive league and you need to be putting in more effort than that. This sort of thing does not happen to any other player.
Banned 4 days
As I said in the last appeal the matter is closed. It has already been reviewed multiple times and there won’t be anything productive to come from this. Wait out your ban.
i seem to be banned for whichever seems to stick from the below:
1) 1st was suspecting of lying (which is ridiculous)
2) i dared signed in another game an hour late
3) i reported another teammate for the same game (really? if you post report you are immune to being reported?)
4) i did not type an apology
5) it happened to my a month ago (pc freeze) now happened again – lets make it plausible he afks 2nd time in the same way (even more ridiculous)
6) he fell asleep and now not addmingYou are banned for going afk in the game and nothing else.
Whether you disconnected on your side or not, from the perspective of everyone else you were afk, including the reviewer of the ban request. In the context of reviewing that ban request, the ban was applied correctly. You cannot contest this fact because the evidence as it appears to us is that you are afk in the game and at the time the ban was applied you had not offered any alternative explanation on discord to my knowledge.
Now you wish to appeal your ban on the grounds that you did not afk, you disconnected because your pc froze. Since you haven’t got any evidence for that fact, we can only take your word for it. But we cannot simply take your word for it because if we did, no afk ban would ever be valid. If we unban you here, then everyone else who has the same argument should be unbanned. And anyone can make this argument. There is no evidence you can provide that you disconnected. I am not going to call you a liar, or tell you that I can say with absolute certainty that you did not disconnect. But even if you did, there’s nothing to stop the next person simply using it as an excuse with no evidence as well.
You also mention that you have no history of going afk. While that may be true, neither does almost anyone else. We hardly ever ban people for afk and people play the vast majority of their games without going afk. Again you could use that argument for almost any player in the league so it is not valid.
All we have to go on is the replay that shows you afk and your word that you had actually disconnected earlier and the game did not register it. Since we cannot take your word for the reasons I outlined, we can only go on the evidence we have, which is the replay. For that reason we cannot unban you.
I would like to one more time emphasize my COMPLAINT, that i`m being harrassed, retaliated on, and insulted by being called a liar.
You need to stop taking everything personally. Anyone is welcome to their own opinion on whether you disconnected or not. In life you don’t have some kind of right for people to believe everything you say. It’s not harassment to not believe someone.
I will close this appeal because I do not see it going anywhere productive discussing it further. It has already been reviewed multiple times.
The only level he leaked was 12. He says ‘I was 1700 val’ when asked why he didn’t build which makes it seem like he didn’t think he could leak with that value and his units. Looking at his lane I wouldn’t have said it would leak either but it did. From that level he built enough value to hold upon request. Holding gold on levels you know they aren’t going to send is common practice when you want to keep your options open for what to build and whether to RR.
Denying this as he cooperated fully and just made one small mistake.
Writing this post to clarify the situation on Anda’s request since he finds it hard to express the exact sentiments behind his review. Having reviewed it myself I agree with him:
1. You are correct that it is impossible to determine with 100 percent certainty whether someone ragequit. However there are rare situations where it is certain enough to cause a ban. When they type something in chat that indicates the reason for the quit and then quit immediately after, it is beyond reasonable doubt that they quit on purpose. That is what happened here.
2. The rule to remake before 3 is designed to apply for accidental disconnects. It is not intended for people that quit on purpose. It would not make sense to remake with someone who does not want to play and broke the rules on purpose. People were just following common sense in that regard. If there were any doubt that he ragequit then you should handle it as a dc, but he typed in chat for all to see and quit immediately after, so it should be obvious to everyone involved. Furthermore, there is no obligation to remake because someone fucked up (forgot to build or send, whether caused by lag or otherwise)
3. In this situation it was better to continue the game than to draw. Otherwise you could simply try to force a draw when your teammate fucks up by leaving on purpose.
4. If you are unsure how the rules apply in a situation then go with the decision of the lobby (in this case to end and move on) as you are just confusing matters.Without a doubt this was terribly played. TK is about intentional team killing though, not playing poorly. If you think he is too low skilled to be in the league, that’s something you need to discuss with admins with multiple replay proofs rather than using ban requests. If you believe he is intentionally trolling then that can be a matter for ban requests, but I cannot see the chat in this game so that is impossible to evaluate. If you have the replay from your perspective then upload it here.
Firstly in future please fill out the form properly. ‘Flame trolling whole game pretty much’ is not enough to go on. Need additional info so we know exactly what happened when and why before we go into the replay. If we feel as if you are not putting any effort into these ban requests we will deny them in future.
The scenario ingame is you are OBing every level with aqua and your teammates get annoyed with you. I do believe that fjutold goes too far with hounding you about it (carries on long past the relevant time and becomes more personal). There is not much flame to go on however (individual excessive words). Will resolve this via DM with the player rather than giving a warning.
Two mods had a look at this and came to the same conclusion so there is no need for a second opinion.
I don’t see excessive flame just a minor argument. I will talk to Cotor about staying more chill in game. No need for a warning the most flame I can see is ‘idiot’.
Gave him a warning. We all fuck up sometimes like that but if it becomes a habit then it will be a ban.
Tin did swap you before 5 minutes from the bot announcing the lobby host however given that he swapped you back after the new rules on swapping were explained to him there was no harm done. On the other hand, Reid swapping u out again after the rules have been explained and you are present is definitely malicious in my book.
Reid is banned 12hr.
I think mixing mino in with priv is bad, but that’s not a matter for ban requests, you say he doesn’t communicate on the first levels but he does answer you consistently and cooperates the rest of the game.
It’s not teamkill to play a build you believe is best even if your team doesn’t want you to, you can make your own build decisions so long as they are in good faith. I don’t think he was trolling. If you think his skill level is not to the level of FBG then that’s not a matter for BRQs but rather you can discuss it with admins with a number of replays displaying his skill level.
Best thing to do is to discuss with him why you think his build is bad. Instead first thing that happens is he’s threatened with ban requests etc. People are more willing to communicate and cooperate when not threatened.
Don’t see need for a warning or ban.
I called the 5 send and didnt force it because we know they lots of aoe and bad vs murgh, and we legit didnt need the king on 3 to save the heal.
Well you say ‘mb’ in the chat so it doesn’t look like you were calculating how much u needed to save the heal but just weren’t paying attention.
In the case where the majority of the team is against your call or you cannot come to a consensus, do not force your own call by sending before the discussion is finished. You should give enough time for players to object to your call before sending.
Eternal says ‘just clog and send 6/7 please’ as 5 starts, you then call ‘go 5’and immediately send. Not only does this leave zero time to discuss your call (and I do not see any chat where you were elected caller) but someone else just made a call suggestion right before u force your own and leave no chance for the other 2 teammates to say anything. This is against the spirit of cooperation. If you want to be elected caller that’s fine, ask your teammates at the start of the game to let you call.
On 5 you were obviously dead so not upping doesn’t matter.
And also im wondering why my calls are “forcing” and his calls are “team decision” when nobody on our team agreed hes the caller.
In this game at least he did not force, he asked at the start of the game for clog, you agreed to it, you have disagreements about build but still agreed to the initial call. Enough time was given for others to disagree and they were content to follow. Calling up on 3 was obvious given your amount of leaks, and other than that he just asked to send 6/7, while you forced the send on 5 before discussion could be had.
Banned 2 days for forcing send.
