Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Trial approved.
Apologies for the late reply, we work very slowly.
The replays were not a slam dunk(game 2 was bad) but I have hopes you will enjoy playing in LIHL and adapt quickly to how games are played here.
Replay analysis attached to this comment.
Player does not have time to play currently so this application will be denied at this time.
Please reapply when you have time to play!
The replays reviewed were not what we were looking for given the lack of games played by the applicant in recent times.
As I mentioned in DM on discord I encourage you to put in some time to get up to date with the map and new units and then post a new application.
I will attach my game review to this post.
As mentioned in DMs there is a certain level of activity expected for a trial to be granted. You have 2 games played in the past 4 weeks and I cannot imagine you are up to date with the current build/send meta.
If you are serious about giving lihl another shot then I expect you to at the very minimum observe lihl games for a week or two if you are not interested in fbg games.
Greetings,
After reviewing two of the posted replays and discussing it we are denying your application at this time.
I think there is some good in the replays but it does not outweigh the mistakes made which can be found in the written review I will attach to this thread.
I suggest you look at the analysis and apply again when you feel ready.
Supreme vouch review
Game 1 – replay from forum (defiler, ns)
You do a normal defiler start and your team sends warriors. You goal 50 to king.
For level 2 you decide to not get a second defiler and instead make a sentry, this makes your lane weak vs 2 and 3. You should always go two defiler on 2 and if they do not send on level 2 you should always get the third defiler for 3. There is no version of this build where sentry helps your lane before level 5.
Your team goals them on 2 again while the other team skips 2 and instead send 3 where you have 460 value with a ns 1 gap in front of your defiler. You leak a third of the wave and your team burns 1 heal. I said what I have to say about this build before, not great. I think it is worth noting that despite the ns being a terrible idea you had the gold to get 2x ogres for support but instead you do a swamprunner, getting ogres here would’ve have helped your hold considerably.
You add a sentry for 4 going 540 value while sending on level 4. Staying 5/1 despite sending on 4 makes 0 sense. It is always worth it to go 7/2 here and your setup for 5 is strong and will do ok even on low value.
The enemy team does pure disaster send on 5(furb+dt) and you go massive mid.
I stopped watching the replay at this point, you get to full send 7 and enemy team is down bad.
Conclusion: I do not understand why you want to mix ns instead of defiler vs what is very likely a 2 or 3 send. I do not understand why you stay 5/1 for level 5. The other team fail sending and making you fat does not improve your build. I rate this game 2/10
Game 2 – random replay from recent games (https://wc3stats.com/games/543080)
Your roll is vet, panda, rifleman, priest, nm and spawn. You drop a peewee + nm and reroll. New roll has colt, egg, ice troll, bear and dp. Nice.
You decide to keep the peewee and nm and your team sends warriors. (I like this, vet + nm is gonna shine on 2 and 3 where they most likely send.)
You go for the semi hold option and your team resends 4 goaling 25 to king. You are 5/1 with two rider and ice troll behind your melee. You leak sends only.
During 5 you decide to push 7/2, this is fine. You build a maverick for 7 when you have option to get dark priest or riders + egg, i don’t know wtf you are thinking with this decision.
For level 10 you are 7/3 with two dark priest and colt army, good build for 10 but your lane is weak after the fuck up on level 7.
You leak 1 boss which is not bad considering your ~1900 value with a weak setup.
I stopped watching after 10, I think there were numerous mistakes in this game that could have cost your team greatly if the other team didn’t have some drama which made their 7 send a lot worse than it should have been.
Conclusion: Good start to game, going semi for 5 was good but the mistake on level 7 cost your lane dearly. I rate this game 5/10
Game 3 – random replay from recent games (https://wc3stats.com/games/539275)
Your roll is gnoll, lock, ns, copter, komodo, ygg. Really strong roll.
You start 160 value 2x sentry. This can free leak, not a good idea with such an op roll. (Doing this in lihl would probably result in much flaming towards your build.)
You up the front ns for 2 and for 3 you go for a copter. (I think starting komodo this game wouldve been the better move. You have a lot easier time dealing with 2 and 3 with komodo + gnolls/sentries.)
Your setup for 3 is sentry wall pull, ns behind, copter in line and 2 gnolls behind the ns. You get a bo + bow send and get smoked leaking half the wave. Goodbye op roll.
Your team burns two heals during 3 after which you decide to go holder for 5. I do not think it is your job to go ob after dying on 3, you are gonna be low value with low income.
You stay low for levels 4 and 5 but on level 7 you are suddenly 7/3 leaking half the wave vs send. (Danny calls you out for this, if you decide to cover 5 then you need to commit and cover 7. Komodo on 6 into a Trident for 7 would make you mid most likely.
Level 9 you decide it’s finally time to build a komodo?!? Might as well just do locks and sentries and pray for miracle mid, the komodo will not mix well with tok in mid game.
Level 10 you get the Trident. (You still only have 6 gnolls, you should 100% have skipped this Trident and done full ranged with ~10 gnolls to delay, you would be setting yourself up for a good time in mid game.)
To illustrate how much better staying low for 7 would’ve been you have a teammate that is 120 value and 1 jack higher than you because he pushed early and then stayed 7/2 for 7 going mid.
You leak 2 bosses on 10, pure disaster.
Conclusion: Pretty bad game, you risk op roll on 1, don’t push early and then full push for 7 leaking to then stay and leak again on 10. Pure murder of a strong roll. I rate this game 3/10
None of the three games I reviewed were great and two of them were pretty bad. You are a long time player and I am surprised to see you making mistakes like doing saber as anti 3 or full pushing from level 5 to 7 and then not pushing again after 7.
I suggest you take a look at what went wrong in these games and apply again in a few weeks time if that is what you desire.
Vouch request denied.
idk what ur smoking calling king in a game where your team has 4x shit rolls and 3 of them like a slow game
that being said forgetting to build on level 2 with aqua is pretty yikes
Nice joke, this toxic asshole root acts like a complete monkey every time he is drunk and accepts no responsibility.
Not only do you act like a complete baboon but you try to shift blame here by saying I was dodging my roll. I regret joining the remake because I was stuck on the same team as you again which was the whole point of leaving the game. I legit hope your computer burns down and you never get to log online again.
Hello imba,
Myself and epicdeath went over some of your replays. Below is a link to my review of two of them.
Overall the quality of the replays posted here are below what we would like to see. I suggest you to get some better replays.
If you have any questions you can dm me or the admins on discord.
Ban Colombiano for what exactly? West decided to sell, two players called “gg” in all chat and then when I am asked by Colombiano if we are selling I say yes.
It is not allowed to lie about selling, once we’ve decided to sell and call gg in all chat the game is over.
My team decided they wanted to go back on their word because we get immolation spell in a game that is already 99% lost, they ratted a draw on day 4 in the fucking season.
If anyone should be banned in this game it is my entire team for being rats.