Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Hi Xyu,
You recently had 2 afk bans (https://firstbloodgaming.com/forums/topic/afk-xyu972228-2/ and https://firstbloodgaming.com/forums/topic/xyu97-afk/). On top of that I played a game with you the same day at the pituca ban where you did afk without notice as well and I just didn’t report it (https://wc3stats.com/games/369987 – lvl 3 here).
It seems to be a clear pattern and everyone “jokes” about it. You need to fix this and only play if you are able to focus and give it the attention needed. Since the first 2 bans didn’t help, you will get a lengthier ban now in the hope that it will turn into a change of behavior.
Banned 120 hours. Processing.
- This reply was modified 1 year ago by hal9k.
Approved for trial from the council
Already dealt with.
Hello hi,
Sorry for not getting back to you before (I think we did in DMs though). While we highly appreciate your offer to help and assist us, we will have to reject your admin application. While we do not expect a 100% clean record, you have had 9 bans (other than the noshows+dc bans) applied to you. Your past issues with toxicity and hostility towards members in the community will be a hindrance for being a good fit for the admin team.
As I said, we do appreciate the offer a lot, but we have to refuse.
The case is dealt with through this post by MustardTiger. You are not banned anymore and the case is adressed by aforementioned post. If you want to go further with your complaint about me, I will encourage you to reach out to Fantom himself as ACP (through MustardTiger) has tried to address it.
Hello hi,
I just read through the chatlog since it’s a report based upon toxicity. I will deny the ban request because:
You brought as much toxicity into the game as Klaa did; you flamed RockNRoll through the game and called him Tklaa (even tho this was maybe meant as friendly banter, I don’t think Klaa read it this way, taking into account that he wrote in discord that it was first game with you) and you were super hostile against Rock as well. If you behave like you did, then you shouldn’t come complaining about being called “thrash”. You should all (rock, klaa, sweetheart) strive to behave better in the future please.Only banned you based on the intentional throw. I will give you benefit of the doubt and unban you 🙂
February 26, 2023 at 6:50 am in reply to: BlindeN#21622 – intentional teamkilling / harassment #20276After reviewing the game I can conclude that Blinden didn’t try to survive 7 by activating TM nor did communicate with the teammates about this decision.
Banned 48H
After reviewing the game I can conclude that Supremebeing was:
1) Afk at 12 and admitted it in game.
2) Didn’t send in time to reach 2 krakens (“because it’s a tk send”)You should be present at the game and not go afk without letting your teammates know about this, takes 2 sec to pause the game if you need a minute or two.
You can’t refuse to send “because it’s tk” if it’s the call.Banned 72H.
Hello hi,
After reviewing the game, I don’t think the bad kc on 6 and 7 is intentional. Ifrit is a relatively new player and I do not think it’s an intentional throw. He tried his best as far as I can tell, he did build proper up for 7, called kingups for 6, etc.
For another game Ifrit, you should probably ask if someone else wants kc and take notes of how they do it and what they do at 6 against send.
For another game Chandalar, you should not just force your send through at 3 but communicate it with your team.Clear AFK – could have been avoided by pausing or communicating the small leave (was not urgent). Sad situation, in the future please communicate with your team about it Jav.
Banned 36 hours.
Well I understand this involved a bit of miscommunication – BUT pink did suggest 2 but as soon as Sweatheart said no he said he expressed that he did not care hence it was a discussion between you LordMiles and Sweatheart, you should have involved yellow before forcing the send (and yellow didn’t like it either “Why you force)
Banned 24h for solosending.
Pretty clear case. I will ignore what happened at 7 as it didn’t seem intentional – however the afk was clear and bad.
Banned 48 hours.
Comment from Konrad:
“So, he harrassed/flamed me entire game, calling me “idiot” and “ur abusing the community with your existance”, etc.And during the game: clog was called first, then he freeleaked lvl 3, exposing our clog setup. Me and blue therefore obbed for 5, expecting their send, we even got immo so all the more reason to ob. He didn’t even object to me obbing per se, he said “you won’t hold” which was debatable. We all expected a send after that freeleak, he even told blue to ob. thanks.”
KonradKurze is banned 48 hour for refusing to cooperate/team killing. From the beginning of the game Conrad Kurze were reluctant to follow any sort of common gameplan other than his own. (elo captain) teal asked blue to OB with ea+rats in case they came 5, but purp selfishly did 650 value disc+egg and took the feed from the teammates which had a better setup.
Hi!
I did a second review of the game and I am in line with Armageddons decision. The rule is that excessive flaming is not allowed and I would say this is not definitely excessive.
-
AuthorPosts